Legal Opinion

Rosenberg v. Robbert

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided December 10, 1923No. 24115PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLand, J.

Plaintiff, as the holder and owner, for value before maturity, of a certain promissory note for $4,500, has instituted suit against the defendant, the alleged maker, to recover said sum with interest and attorney’s fees.

The note is of date September 12, 1919, is payable to maker, and purports to have been indorsed by him.

Immediately below the alleged signature of the maker as indorser appears the fo'lowing indorsement: “For collection Eph. Rosenberg.”

Defendant denies in his answer that said note was made by him, or was signed by him, but alleges that said note is a forgery.

We have before us…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Howard v. Illinois Trust & Savings BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Teutonia Bank & Trust Co. v. HeaslipSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1916

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. White System of Shreveport v. TheusLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API