Koger v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
PBENDEBGAST, Presiding Judge.
The complaint and information is in several counts, some charging adultery in that the woman was married and appellant was not married, and in another charging fornication in that both were unmarried. And for the purpose of authorizing the jury to find double punishment, it was alleged that3 previously appellant had been convicted of fornication with said woman.
Appellant earnestly contends that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the verdict. We will, therefore, give - substantially the testimony which was as follows:
The State proved by Armón Yates, deputy…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Muckenfuss v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
3Cited by9 opinions
- Childress v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
- Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1957
- Chapman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
- George v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
- La Duke v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1958
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.