Legal Opinion

Lincoln Lamar Caldwell v. State of Minnesota

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 19, 2016No. A15-1587PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUDSON, Justice.'

In 2008, appellant Lincoln Lamar Caldwell was convicted of first-degree murder for the benefit of a gang on an accomplice-liability' theory. We affirmed Caldwell’s conviction and the denial of his first two postconviction petitions in August 2011. See State v. Caldwell (Caldwell I), 803 N.W.2d 373 (Minn.2011). Caldwell subsequently filed a third postconviction petition in May 2012, in which he alleged that three witnesses presented false testimony at his trial. The postconviction court summarily denied Caldwell’s petition. Caldwell appealed to our court, arguing that…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Webb v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Larrison v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1928
  4. State v. GrillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  5. United States v. John Cardillo, Lawrence Harris, Ralph Kaminsky, John Knapp, Louis Margolis, and Louis PiselliCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. WaitersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
  2. Reed v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
  3. Caldwell v. MilesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2019
  4. Tenner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API