State v. Jackson
Supreme Court of Georgia
1ConcurrenceFletcher, Presiding Justice
Because the child abuse registry statute limits the right of persons placed on the list to appeal their classification, I agree that it violates due process and, therefore, is unconstitutional.
1. OCGA § 49-5-183.1 governs challenges by persons who are deemed to be “an alleged child abuser” under the act establishing the central child abuse registry. Upon receiving a report of “confirmed” or “unconfirmed” child abuse, the county DFACS office must notify the alleged abuser of the report classification and of that person’s right to appeal the classification in an administrative hearing.7 The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- MATTER OF LEE TT. v. DowlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- J.P. v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.