Legal Opinion

Walter v. Hall

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided August 4, 1997No. 95CA0509PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge TAUBMAN.

In this action based on allegations of trespass and deceptive trade practices, defendants, Larry L. Hall, Craig A. Hammond, and Wild Horse Ranch, appeal from the verdicts and judgment against them and in favor of plaintiffs, Patricia L. and Reuben A. Walter. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings.

In 1985, a developer established a subdivision known as Longhorn Ranch Phase III. Defendants Hall and Hammond worked for the original developer selling individual lots in the subdivision. In 1989, a bank acquired the property through foreclosure…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Wimberly v. EttenbergSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  2. People v. SpotoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  3. People v. IbarraSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  4. People v. QuintanaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  5. Hock v. New York Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1994

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hall v. WalterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  2. McIntyre v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
  3. Littlefield v. BambergerColorado Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Martinez v. LewisColorado Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Alexander v. McClellanColorado Court of Appeals · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API