Texas v. Donoghue
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partHutcheson, Circuit Judge
Except as it affirms the denial of the State’s petition to be allowed to proceed in condemnation against the alleged “unlawful oil,” I concur in the general result of the decision. I agree, too, with the general statement of the opinion as to the jurisdiction of the bankruptcy court in reorganization proceedings, and in all that is said with regard to the first suit. I do not agree with, but' respectfully dissent from, what is said as to the effect on the second suit of the filing of the debtor’s petition for reorganization. The authorities the opinion-cites lead, I think, to a conclusion…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mingus, Receiver v. WadleyTexas Supreme Court · 1926
- Penn Central Casualty Co. v. Pennsylvania Ex Rel. SchnaderSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Metcalf v. BarkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Pennsylvania v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. Lake Street Elevated RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.