Johnson Controls, Inc. v. London Market
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1DissentAnnette Kingsland Ziegler, J.
A. The majority decision is contrary to longstanding principles of insurance law
¶ 90. True excess coverage "exists as a part of layered coverage created by specific design and is intended to come into play only when the limits of underlying primary coverage are exhausted." 14 Lee R. Russ & Thomas F. Segalla, Couch on Insurance § 200:39 (3d ed. 2007). As a general rule, an excess insurer is not required to defend until the primary insurer's policy limits are exhausted, even when the claim exceeds the primary insurer's policy limits or when the primary *215insurer refuses to defend. Id., §§…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- In RE MARRIAGE OF COOK v. CookWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
- Loy v. BundersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
- Folkman v. QuammeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- Signal Companies, Inc. v. Harbor Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
- American Motorists Insurance v. Trane Co.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1982
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.