Maloy v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TOM GRAY, Justice.
The victim of an intoxication assault testified about the nature and dollar amount of the medical expenses she incurred. The penal code requires expenses for medical services to be “necessary” in order to qualify for restitution. Is only the testimony of the victim adequate to support restitution for medical services, or must the damages be supported by additional evidence such as documentary proof or other proof of reasonableness and necessity? Because we hold the testimony of the victim of the amounts of medical expenses actually incurred is adequate to support an…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Zillender v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Cartwright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Chambers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Rochelle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Bouchillon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Idowu v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Lemos v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2000
- Maes v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2008
- Kimball v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2000
- Miller v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2011
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.