Legal Opinion

Blair v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 27, 1984No. Appeal, No. 123 C.D. 1983PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Craig,

Agnes Blair, pro se, appeals an order by the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board which, in affirming .a referee’s decision, terminated her benefits, but also ordered her employer and its insurance carrier, to pay Ms. Blair compensation which they had unilaterally suspended after she did not appear for a physical examination.

We must decide if substantial evidence of record supports the referee’s finding that Ms. Blair is no longer disabled because of a work-related injury1 and if section 314 of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act2 authorized the employer to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Shenango Steel Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Everett v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Maranc v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Brown v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Maranc v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Murphy v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Wolfe v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API