Blair v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Craig,
Agnes Blair, pro se, appeals an order by the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board which, in affirming .a referee’s decision, terminated her benefits, but also ordered her employer and its insurance carrier, to pay Ms. Blair compensation which they had unilaterally suspended after she did not appear for a physical examination.
We must decide if substantial evidence of record supports the referee’s finding that Ms. Blair is no longer disabled because of a work-related injury1 and if section 314 of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act2 authorized the employer to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Shenango Steel Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Everett v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
3Cited by9 opinions
- Maranc v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Brown v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Maranc v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Murphy v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Wolfe v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.