Legal Opinion
United States v. John P. Mau
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided January 18, 1995No. 94-2004PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FLAUM, Circuit Judge.
Defendant John P. Mau pleaded guilty to bank fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1344(a)(1) and received an eight month sentence. Mau argues on appeal that the district court incorrectly sentenced him under the guidelines by improperly enhancing his sentencing for “more than minimal planning” and by erring in the calculation of the loss suffered as a result of the bank fraud. We hold that the district court made no errors in applying the sentencing guidelines and now affirm.
I
In 1988, John P. Mau formed “401 Partners,” a limited partnership of which Mau was the sole general partner,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. James E. CareyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Richard S. HoliusaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- United States v. John R. MountCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- United States v. H. Jay MummertCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- United States of America, Cross-Appellant v. Patrick J. Doherty, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- United States v. Elie F. Abboud (04-3942) and Michel Abboud (04-3943)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- United States of America, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. John C. Whitehead, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Vincent LaneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Charles R. MichalekCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- United States v. AustinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.