Legal Opinion

United States Plywood Corp. v. Hudson Lumber Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 13, 1955PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IRVING R. KAUFMAN, District Judge.

The instant motion to dismiss defendants’ “Partial Defense and Set-off by way of Recoupment” or in the alternative to direct the defendants to furnish a more definite statement of the nature of their claim as set forth in the aforementioned defense is but one in a series of motions addressed to the pleadings which have been heard and decided by other judges of this court.1 “There thus ■ seems an air of unreality about what has happened, as though the parties had been essaying preliminary trials of strength * * United States Plywood Corporation v. Hudson…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
  2. Dioguardi v. DurningCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  3. Foundry Services, Inc. v. Beneflux CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
  4. Matter of National Cash Register Co. v. JosephNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  5. Michigan Yacht & Power Co. v. BuschCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1906

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Desjardins v. DesjardinsDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1961
  2. Staab v. ThoresonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Wright v. McCannDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956
  4. Shenandoah Life Insurance v. HawesDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1965
  5. Midori Hosokawa v. Screen Actors Guild-American, Federation of Television & RadioDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API