United States Plywood Corp. v. Hudson Lumber Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
IRVING R. KAUFMAN, District Judge.
The instant motion to dismiss defendants’ “Partial Defense and Set-off by way of Recoupment” or in the alternative to direct the defendants to furnish a more definite statement of the nature of their claim as set forth in the aforementioned defense is but one in a series of motions addressed to the pleadings which have been heard and decided by other judges of this court.1 “There thus ■ seems an air of unreality about what has happened, as though the parties had been essaying preliminary trials of strength * * United States Plywood Corporation v. Hudson…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
- Dioguardi v. DurningCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Foundry Services, Inc. v. Beneflux CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- Matter of National Cash Register Co. v. JosephNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Michigan Yacht & Power Co. v. BuschCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1906
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Desjardins v. DesjardinsDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1961
- Staab v. ThoresonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
- Wright v. McCannDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956
- Shenandoah Life Insurance v. HawesDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1965
- Midori Hosokawa v. Screen Actors Guild-American, Federation of Television & RadioDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.