Legal Opinion

All Minerals Corp. v. Kunkle

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1989No. 19413PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

In this case, we are asked whether the district court has the power to declare the actions of a party a nullity when the party acts in violation of a preliminary injunction. We hold that the *836district court may not nullify an action taken in violation of a preliminary injunction unless the party that obtained the injunction properly attacks the validity of the act. Under this rule, the district court in the case at bar did not have the power to nullify an action that was a violation of the preliminary injunction. Consequently, we reverse.

Facts

In 1967, respondents Dalton and Kunkle…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Noble v. NobleNevada Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Town of Fond Du Lac v. City of Fond Du LacWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Candler v. Wallace Candler, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1962

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Womack v. Eggebrecht (In re Demis)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Montana · 1996
  2. Valley Forge Life Insurance v. DelaneyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2002
  3. Majuba Mining, Ltd. v. Pumpkin Copper, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API