Legal Opinion

State v. Morgan

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 22, 2008No. A07A1873PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Presiding Judge.

The trial court granted Bobby Morgan’s motion to suppress results of a state-administered blood test. The state appeals. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

Morgan was involved in a two-car collision in which two people were killed and several other people were injured. A state trooper who arrived on the scene saw Morgan walking around and talked to him. The officer looked for signs that Morgan was impaired, but saw none. Morgan sustained a head injury in the collision and was transported to the hospital. He was treated and released from the hospital a few hours…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cooper v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
  2. State v. CauseyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  3. State v. CollierSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
  4. Harrelson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  5. Costley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  2. McMullen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  3. DIAZ v. the STATE.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
  4. Tammie McMuell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API