Legal Opinion

Alaimo v. 3M Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 16, 2009No. 07-4523-cvPublished

1Opinion of the Court

*705 SUMMARY ORDER

Plaintiffs-Appellants Minette Alaimo and Susan Alaimo, pro se, appeal from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Brieant, /.), granting summary-judgment to Defendants-Appellees. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts and procedural history.

We review orders granting summary judgment de novo and focus on whether the district court properly concluded that there was no genuine issue as to any material fact and the moving party was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See Miller v. Wolpoff & Abramson, L.L.P., 321 F.3d…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Miller v. Wolpoff & Abramson, L.L.P.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  3. Kathleen Madaline Jarvis, Individually and as a Parent and Guardian of Paul Michael Attila Jarvis, a Minor v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  4. Martin T. Kosmynka and Christine Kosmynka v. Polaris Industries, Inc., Docket No. 05-3958-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  5. Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API