Legal Opinion

Conlon v. Douglas

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1960No. Docket No. 26, Calendar No. 48,653PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.

The sole question posed by this case is whether the maker of a will may, by its express terms, limit the effect of the Michigan statute of descent and distribution as to property not disposed of by will.

The facts in the matter are undisputed. Emma Brown, the testatrix, made a will in 1957. The will contained numerous specific bequests to the objects of Emma Brown’s bounty, including one to appellant Lepha Conlon. The will apparently sought to dispose of all Mrs. Brown’s property. It contained no residuary clause.

The present dispute arises from this last fact, plus the fact that 1 of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Coffman v. CoffmanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1888
  2. Lamere v. JacksonMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Detroit Wabeek Bank & Trust Co. v. City of AdrianMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Todd v. GentryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901
  5. In Re McKay EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Brown EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API