Legal Opinion

City of Gainesville v. Helton

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 10, 1989No. 88-2152PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WIGGINTON, Judge.

The deputy commissioner’s order directing the employer/servicing agent to pay the outstanding medical bills for remedial care and treatment rendered by Doctors Tingle and Hooshmand is affirmed as based on competent and substantial evidence but only to the extent that it relates to remedial care and treatment rendered by these doctors up until August 10, 1983, the date of maximum medical improvement. Insofar as the award of payment of medical bills for remedial care and treatment extends beyond the date of MMI, it is improper. See City of Gainesville v. Helton, 458 So.2d 1195…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Killebrew Manufacturing Company v. DawsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  2. City of Gainesville v. HeltonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Florida Refreshment & General Adjustment Bureau v. WhaleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API