State v. Schaub
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
. Per Curiam¡
'The sole issue for determination is whether the .actions of trial. counsel for the state in informing the defense witness of his Fifth Amendment right, to remain"'silent,. calling the ,court’s attention to-'possible difficulties with the defendant’s testimony, and ¡the'trial court’s subsequent rulings thereon,"weie ^prejudicial fo-the defendant’s rights under the Sixth Amendment and-Section 10, Articlé 'I, Ohio Constitution, to obtain witnesses in his favor. ' ; ; ■•'..,•• ' :..In Hoffman v. United States. (1951), 341 U. S. 479, 486, the United States. Supreme Court stated with…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Rogers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Temple v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1881
- United States v. Claude L. Smith, United States of America v. James P. JarvisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. RobbinsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. KingIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. PooleOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. PooleOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. PooleOhio Supreme Court · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.