Legal Opinion

Brown v. Burk

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 12, 1993No. 93-0343PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*475ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND MOTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

2Per curiam

We deny the motion for rehearing and rehearing en banc of our February 24, 1993, denial of petitioners’ request for a writ of mandamus/certiorari. See Ronbeck Construction Co. v. Savanna Club, 592 So.2d 344 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992), and Lindsey v. Sherman, 402 So.2d 1349 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981). We note conflict with Hobbs v. Florida First National Bank, 480 So.2d 153 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985), Valiante v. Allstate Insurance, 462 So.2d 590 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985), and Spring v. Ronel Refining, 421 So.2d 46 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).

HERSEY, DELL and POLEN, JJ.,…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ronbeck Const. Co., Inc. v. Savanna Club Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  2. Spring v. Ronel Refining, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  3. Lindsey v. ShermanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  4. Hobbs v. FLORIDA FIRST NAT. BANKDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  5. Valiante v. Allstate Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Adams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API