Legal Opinion · Dissent

Anderson v. International Minerals & Chemical Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 14, 1945Published

1DissentCallahan, J.

I find no substantial difference between the provisions for converting shares under the merger or consolidation statute (Stock Corporation Law, § 91) in its present form, and the reclassification statute (Stock Corporation Law, § 36) as it existed prior to 1943, at least insofar as said statutes relate to extinguishing the right to receive accumulated dividends on preference shares.

Of course, a merger or consolidation of two or more corporations differs essentially from a reclassification of shares in one corporation. By its nature the former step requires the formation of a single…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Davison v. Parke, Austin & Lipscomb, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. Strout v. Cross, Austin & Ireland Lumber Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API