Smith v. Kiger
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
SPROUL, J., pro tem.
The defendant, Earl L. Kiger, is the father of plaintiff’s wife, and is sued for recovery of damages on account of the alleged alienation of the wife’s affections. The action was brought against both Mr. and *610Mrs. Kiger, but at the close of the evidence a motion for non-suit was granted in favor of Mrs. Kiger; hence she is not a party to the judgment, nor is she a party to this appeal. This ease was tried before a jury, and upon the verdict of the jury a judgment was rendered against the defendant, Earl L. Kiger, in the sum of $10,000. From this judgment defendant appeals.
Th…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Newson v. HawleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Cripe v. CripeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Barton v. BartonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906
- Trumbull v. TrumbullNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
- Young v. YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1894
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. PorterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Jefferson v. KenossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Smith v. KigerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935