Legal Opinion

Pesko v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 9, 1990No. 410-89TPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRUGGINK, Judge.

The issue presented by this action is whether the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) timely assessed plaintiffs for their 1970 income tax deficiency. The matter is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss and plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment. After consideration of the record, the parties’ argument, and the applicable law, defendant’s motion is granted.

*688. BACKGROUND FACTS

The relevant facts are undisputed. On or about April 15, 1971 the Peskos timely filed a joint tax return for the 1970 calendar year. The Peskos executed a series of consents to extensions…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Albert White and Vivian B. White v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  2. Security Industrial Insurance Company v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  3. Pacific Far East Line, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
  4. United States v. ShepardDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1961
  5. Ramirez v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ripley v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1995
  2. Joseph Pesko and Stephanie Pesko v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  3. Ripley v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1995
  4. Walter R. Ripley, Donee-Transferee of Mildred M. Ripley, Donor, and Melynda H. Ripley, Donee-Transferee of Mildred M. Ripley, Donor v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API