Legal Opinion

State v. DiLuzio

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 27, 2004No. Nos. 22027-3-III; 22028-1-IIIPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

In separate incidents, Elmer B. DiLuzio, Jr., was charged with possessing heroin, second degree theft, and making a false statement. Without the prosecutor’s referral, he unsuccessfully petitioned for admission to drug court. He was convicted as charged. The sole issue on appeal is whether the prosecutor or the trial court retains the power to refer a defendant to drug court. We agree with the trial court that the prosecutor retains executive discretion to decide whether to recommend referral to drug court. Accordingly, we affirm.

FACTS

Mr. DiLuzio was charged with possession of a controlled…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. PirtleWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. PirtleWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. FinchWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. People v. Superior Court (On Tai Ho)California Supreme Court · 1974
  5. State v. LeeWashington Supreme Court · 1976

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. DiLuzioCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API