Thomas v. Hobson
Columbiana Circuit Court
Appeaded from Columbiana common pleas court. Cited and commented upon tbe following authorities: Gillen v. .Kimball, 34 Ohio St. 352; Charch v. Charch, 57 Ohio St. 561 [49 N. E. .Rep. 408]; Collins v. Collins, 40 Ohio St. 353; Cassidy v. Hynton, 44 Ohio St. 530 [9 N. E. Rep. 129] ; Linton v. Laycock, 33 Ohio St. 128; Richey v. Johnson, 30 Ohio St. 288; Baxter v. Bowyer, 19 Ohio St. 490; Shaw v. Hoard, 18 Ohio St. 227; Edwards v. Rainier, 17 Ohio St. 597; Starling v. Price,…
Read the full summary
Appeaded from Columbiana common pleas court. Cited and commented upon tbe following authorities: Gillen v. .Kimball, 34 Ohio St. 352; Charch v. Charch, 57 Ohio St. 561 [49 N. E. .Rep. 408]; Collins v. Collins, 40 Ohio St. 353; Cassidy v. Hynton, 44 Ohio St. 530 [9 N. E. Rep. 129] ; Linton v. Laycock, 33 Ohio St. 128; Richey v. Johnson, 30 Ohio St. 288; Baxter v. Bowyer, 19 Ohio St. 490; Shaw v. Hoard, 18 Ohio St. 227; Edwards v. Rainier, 17 Ohio St. 597; Starling v. Price, 16 Ohio St. 29; Brasher v. Marsh, 15 Ohio St. 103; Parker v. Parker, 13 Ohio St. 95; 2 Jarman, Wills 744; Clyde V.…
1Opinion of the Court
•COOK, J.
This action is by the executors of the wills of John Hoyle and Dor■othy Hoyle, deceased, and is for the purpose of obtaining the direction and judgment of the court under Rev. Stat. 6202 (Lan. 9743), respecting the distribution of the estates of the decedents.
John Hoyle made his last will and testament on June 3, 1886. The second, ninth and tenth items of the will, which are in controversy, are as follows:
”2. I will and bequeath to my beloved wife, Dorothy Hoyle, during her natural life, all the property that I own or possess at the time of my decease, real, personal or mixed, and at…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In Re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of PiffardNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Hoey v. Aspell & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1898
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bettman v. Northern InsOhio Court of Appeals · 1938