Legal Opinion

Taliaferro v. Davis

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 21, 1962No. Civ. 20209PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDraper, P. J.

The basic action is one by the state against Taliaferro for recovery of rents allegedly collected by him upon land deeded to the state for default in payment of taxes. Among other cross-complaints, defendant filed two against his former wife, now Dorothy Davis, and her attorney. These were stricken upon motion, and defendant appeals.

A cross-complaint is permitted only when it seeks relief “relating to or depending upon the contract, transaction, matter, happening or accident upon which the action is brought or affecting the property to which the action relates” (Code Civ. Proc., §442).

Giving…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Taliaferro v. TaliaferroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  2. Taliaferro v. TaliaferroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Taliaferro v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API