Legal Opinion

Boyd v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 24, 1982No. 60902PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McCORMICK, Judge.

This is an appeal from a conviction for commercial obscenity. Punishment was assessed at 150 days’ confinement and a $1,000 fine.

In his first ground of error appellant alleges that the trial court erred in commenting on the evidence by characterizing the material that was the subject matter of the trial. The record shows at the commencement of the voir dire of the jury the judge stated:

“THE COURT: Good morning. We are now ready to start. I am Judge Orvis, and I am the Judge of this Court, County Criminal Court No. 2. And I want to welcome you up here for your services…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Alejandro v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
  3. Jenkins v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. McKenzie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  5. Todd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  2. Allridge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  3. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  4. Tutt v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1997
  5. Taylor v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API