Legal Opinion · Dissent

Mansfield v. Southern Oregon Stages

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1931Published

1DissentRossman, J.

Being of the opinion that the map mentioned in the decision of the majority was inadmissible, and that an error of material consequence to the defendant was committed when it was received in evidence, I dissent from the foregoing, and avail myself of this opportunity of expressing my reasons. The map is prepared in professional style and is the handiwork of Mr. E. B. Henry, county engineer of Klamath county. His official imprint upon the map, together with other collateral matters, might readily have led the jury to believe that this plat was one of an official character. Its size is amply…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Adams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1891
  2. State v. RemingtonOregon Supreme Court · 1907
  3. People v. . JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. Hatcher v. Quincy Horse Railway & Carrying Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1913
  5. Zinser v. Sanitary DistrictAppellate Court of Illinois · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API