Legal Opinion

Ewing v. Russell

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1965No. File 10201PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff, a private secretary, brought this action to recover damages from her employer's lessors for personal injuries resulting from a fall. It was her claim defendants had negligently placed excessive wax on the floor making it dangerous to walk on, and failed to maintain it in a reasonable safe condition. Upon trial, the jury returned a verdict for defendants, and from a judgment thereon, plaintiff appealed. Defendants' answer denied placing excessive wax on the floor, alleged the wax applied was of a kind in common use, of safe quality and not such as to make the floor slippery or…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lance v. Van WinkleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1948
  2. Piper v. Barber Transportation Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
  3. McAllister v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1958
  4. Keith v. Jos. G. Schmersahl Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1963

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. No HeartSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Gerlach v. Ethan Coop Lumber Ass'nSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. JenkinsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Larson v. MeyerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Gerlach v. Ethan Coop Lumber Ass'nSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API