Legal Opinion

Wanis v. Zwennes

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 1, 1976No. 9320PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

In her action against appellee for assault and battery, appellant sought both actual and punitive damages. At trial appellee argued that the evidence did not warrant submission to the jury of the issue of punitive damages. The trial court first indicated agreement with appellee but later decided the issue should be put to the jury. The jury awarded appellant compensatory damages of $1093 and punitive damages of $10,000. On posttrial motion, the trial court set aside the award of punitive damages, 1 and the only question on this appeal is whether appellant’s evidence entitled her to have the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Afro-American Publishing Co., Inc. v. Eli Jaffe, T/a Douglas PharmacyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
  2. Franklin Investment Co. v. HomburgDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. Price v. GriffinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. CliserCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  5. Black v. Sheraton Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Loews L'Enfant Plaza HotelDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1981
  2. Feltman v. SarbovDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Smith v. Executive Club, Ltd.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. District of Columbia v. Remi BamideleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. King v. Kirlin Enterprises, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API