Legal Opinion

Amacker v. Kent

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 6, 1919No. 21619PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from Twenty-Fifth Judicial District Court, Parish of Tangipahoa; W. Schofield Rownd, Judge. Action by Richard M. Amacker, Jr., against R. A. Kent, with demand in reconvention. Judgment for plaintiff for a certain amount with interest and for defendant on his demand in reconvention, and plaintiff appeals, and defendant, answering, prays that the judgment be amended.

1Opinion of the Court

Statement of the Case.

MONROE, C. J.

Plaintiff alleges that defendant induced him to engage with him, as a partner, in the business of buying and selling cattle, defendant to furnish the capital and plaintiff his time and services, and, after paying expenses, the net profits to be equally divided; that the partnership has never terminated by any agreement, but that defendant refused to divide certain profits, including 32 head of cattle, thereafter refused to continue furnishing capital, or to go on with the business; and that, by reason of his action and inaction, he (plaintiff) was thrown out…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Darden v. CoxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1960
  2. Walker v. DelahoussayeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. Jeffries v. MooreSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1951
  4. Fossier v. American Printing Co., Ltd.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. Sas Jaworsky v. LeBlancLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1970

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API