Legal Opinion

Howard v. Cockrell

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided October 29, 1929PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion oe the Court by

Commissioner Stanley—

Reversing.

The appellant, Sylvester Howard, and the appellee, S. J. Cockrell, who are brothers-in-law, and one William J. Landrum, were opposing candidates for the Democratic nomination for jailer of Breathitt county at the recent primary election. On the face of the returns, Cockrell received 1,798 votes, Landrum 1,707, and the contestant, Howard, 454. The certificate of nomination was accordingly awarded to Cockrell. Howard instituted the contest against him and Landrum, and they filed answers and counter contests. However, during the proceedings,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Roberts v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  2. Landrum v. CockrellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  3. Howard v. CockrellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Scalf v. PursifullCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  2. Hogg v. CombsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  3. Gallagaher v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
  4. Lovely v. CockrellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  5. Broughton v. RidingsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API