Sacramento Suncreek Apartments, LLC v. Cambridge Advantaged Properties II, L.P.
California Court of Appeal
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HULL, J.
California’s long-arm statute permits the exercise of personal jurisdiction “on any basis not inconsistent with the Constitution of this state or of the United States.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 410.10.) Under the due process clause of the United States Constitution, a nonresident may be subject to personal jurisdiction in the forum state if he has maintained sufficient purposeful contacts with the state, the claims asserted against him arise from those contacts, and the exercise of jurisdiction comports with fair play and substantial justice. (Pavlovich v. Superior Court (2002) 29…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- (HC) Contreras v. People of the State of CaliforniaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- Borsuk v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2015
- Borsuk v. Superior CourtAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 2015
- Coblentz, Patch v. City & Co. of S.F.California Court of Appeal · 2015
- Coblentz, Patch, Duffy & Bass v. City & Co. of SF CA1/3California Court of Appeal · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.