Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Opinion No. (1999)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports

Decided August 2, 1999Published

1Opinion of the Court

Dear Representative Newport,

¶ 0 This Office has received your request for an Attorney General Opinion addressing, in effect, the following question:

1. Does the Oklahoma Agents Licensing Act, 36 O.S. 1421-36O.S. 1429 require telephone representatives of insurancecompanies who do direct telephone soliciting in Oklahoma belicensed as insurance agents? 2. If so, are they required to show proof of continuingeducation?

¶ 1 In order to answer your question, several provisions of the Agent Licensing Act ("Act"), 36 O.S. 1421-36 O.S. 1429 (1998), must be considered.

AGENTS LICENSING ACT

A. Purpose Behind…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. O'Gorman & Young, Inc. v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Sneed v. SneedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
  3. Paulson v. Western Life InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Insurance Co. of North America v. Welch, Ins. Com'rSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Saucier v. Life & Casualty Ins.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API