Legal Opinion

Gerber v. Seaich Realty Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 31, 1940PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCallahan, J.

On November 12, 1932, the plaintiff (then known as Dorothy Mirsky), while employed in a factory on the eighth floor of premises 38 East Thirty-second street, New York city, received personal injuries caused by the falling of a window which she had opened.

The building in which the factory was located was owned by Seaich Realty Company (hereinafter referred to as “ appellant-owner”). Appellants Goldberg and Silverman, copartners, doing business under the name of Piedmont Undergarment Co. (hereinafter called “ appellants-tenants ”), were operating a factory in the eighth floor loft when the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schumer v. CaplinNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  2. Mirsky v. Seaich Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
  3. Goetz v. . DuffyNew York Court of Appeals · 1915

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pollard v. Trivia Building Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1943
  2. Komar v. Dun & Bradstreet Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
  3. Durant v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
  4. Dunn v. SimonNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Moreno v. RelkinCity of New York Municipal Court · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API