Lannen v. Lannen
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance *932with the following Memorandum: We agree with plaintiff that Supreme Court erred in requiring him to pay half the tuition and expenses for high school for his daughter. The statutory test for an award of educational expenses (see, Domestic Relations Law § 240 [1-b] [c] [7]) was not "meant to represent a radical shift away from the traditional rule of 'special circumstances’ ” (Matter of Cassano v Cassano, 203 AD2d 563, 565, affd 85 NY2d 649). The traditional rule is that the father "should not be…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- MATTER OF CASSANO v. CassanoNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Cassano v. CassanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Cohen v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Rocchio v. RocchioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Romansoff v. RomansoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fruchter v. FruchterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Francis v. FrancisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010