Legal Opinion

Zonolite Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 3, 1957No. 304-54PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLaramore, Judge

This is a suit to recover reasonable and entire compensation for alleged patent infringement. Plaintiffs contend that claims 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7 of patent No. 2,355,966 have been infringed by defendant’s underground insulated pipe system installed at McGuire Air Force Base, Wrightstown, New Jersey. The Zonolite Company has been the owner of legal title in and to the patent since its issuance, and Insulating Concrete Corporation is exclusive licensee under the patent for a territory including the location of the accused installation.

The issues now before the court are the validity of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Hotchkiss v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
  5. Potts v. CreagerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Autogiro Company of America v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  2. Lockheed Aircraft Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977
  3. Technical Tape Corporation v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
  4. Harrington Manufacturing Co., Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross v. Idas B. White, Defendant-Appellee-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  5. Martin Dwyer v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API