In re Tanya B.

Motion for reargument granted and upon reargument memorandum decision dated December 19, 1986 [125 AD2d 1006] amended to read as follows:

In this proceeding to adjudicate respondent a person in need of supervision, respondent appeals from an order of adjournment, for a period of six months, in contemplation of dismissal. Because the matter was not restored to the calendar within the six-month period, the petition is deemed dismissed in the furtherance of justice (see, Family Ct Act § 749). The dismissal is manifestly in respondent’s favor (see, People v Marinoff, 98 Misc 2d 367; CPLR 5511;…