Legal Opinion

United States v. Miguel Doningo Gregory

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 11, 2003No. 01-10737PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FISHER, Circuit Judge:

Because the government chose to bring a delayed superseding indictment against the appellant, Miguel Doningo Gregory, we must resolve two constitutional challenges Gregory invoked in the district court, resulting in that court’s dismissal of the government’s most recent indictment charging Gregory with money laundering. In October 1999, the government indicted Gregory on drug charges. Gregory pled guilty to the charges and was sentenced to 247 days in prison, eight months of home detention and three years of supervised release. Then in March 2001, while Gregory was on…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Smith v. HooeySupreme Court of the United States · 1969

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. United States v. OriedoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  2. United States v. Corona-VerberaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  3. United States v. MendozaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. United States v. SantanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. David R. KingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API