Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Phelps

District Court, M.D. Louisiana

Decided March 29, 1985No. Civ. A. 84-295-APublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN V. PARKER, Chief Judge.

This matter is before the court on motion of defendants for summary judgment and motion for severance. Plaintiffs oppose the motion. Federal jurisdiction is alleged under 28 U.S.C. § 1343, 42 U.S.C. § 1981, § 1983 and § 1985(3) as well as under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e.

1. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment as to plaintiff Jones

In their motion for summary judgment, defendants claim that certain of the defendants, namely King, Phelps, Jennings, Martin, Davoli, Rivers, Jones, Holmes, Gallagher, Fanguy, and Whitley are not proper defendants in the Jones 42…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Quern v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Fitzpatrick v. BitzerSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Celia SANCHEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STANDARD BRANDS, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Driscoll v. StuckerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2005
  2. Grayson v. K-Mart Corp.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1994
  3. Citrano v. Allen Correctional CenterDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1995
  4. Bertoncini v. SchrimpfDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
  5. Muhammed v. Board of Supervisors of Southern UniversityDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API