Legal Opinion
Kenneth Childs v. Harvey M. Kaplan and Harvey Tessler
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided October 3, 1972No. 71-1717PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAN OOSTERHOUT, Senior Circuit Judge.
Harvey M. Kaplan and Harvey Tessler have taken timely appeals from the order of the District Court, filed October 19, 1971, requiring each of them to answer interrogatories propounded within thirty days from October 19, 1971. Kaplan has filed no brief in support of his appeal, nor has he taken any steps to prosecute the appeal beyond filing the notice of appeal. Kaplan’s appeal could probably be dismissed for want of prosecution pursuant to FRAP Rule 31(c) and our Rule 13. However, we have chosen not to do so as the issues raised on both appeals are…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Cobbledick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- DiBella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. BlueSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Iowa Beef Processors, Inc. v. Hughes A. BagleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
- Tom J. Gialde v. Time, Inc., Time, Inc. v. Honorable John W. Oliver, Judge of the United States District Court for the Western District of MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
- Jose Luis Marcaida and Wife, Anastasia Marcaida v. Ray Rascoe v. Industrial Indemnity Insurance Company, Intervenors-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Brozovsky v. NorquestNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
- Hudak v. Curators of the University of MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.