Legal Opinion

Davis v. Bar T Cattle Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 23, 1967PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.

This appeal presents some novel questions in garnishment.

The plaintiff obtained a judgment against Bar T Cattle Company and on January 30, 1964, a notice of garnishment issued pursuant to a writ of execution was served on the garnishee Bank. The Bank filed a return alleging that it held personal property of Bar T as a chattel mortgagee in possession; that it had been and was liquidating such collateral at private sale because Bar T was in default; and that it was unable to state whether any balance would be remaining for application upon plaintiff’s judgment. The property consisted of cattle…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cloyes v. EckernOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Grover v. HawthorneOregon Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Williams v. GallickOregon Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Credit Service Co. v. FurneyOregon Supreme Court · 1928
  5. R L. McDonald & Co. v. CreagerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Turlay v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Korgan v. WalslebenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  3. Turlay v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeOregon Supreme Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API