Legal Opinion

Middleton v. John Luther & Son

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 14, 1997No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion denied, cross motions granted and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: Supreme Court abused its discretion in granting the motion of plaintiff *954for an extension of time to file a note of issue and in denying the cross motions of defendants to dismiss the complaint for failure to serve a note of issue within 90 days after having been served with 90-day notices pursuant to CPLR 3216. Plaintiff was required to file a note of issue or to move before the default date either to extend the 90-day period or to vacate the notices (see, Spierto v…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Spierto v. PennisiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. Richter v. DunlapAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. Terry v. Southern ContainerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Middleton v. KennyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. Middleton v. John Luther & SonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API