Legal Opinion

Kalish v. MILWAUKEE & SUBURBAN TRANSPORT CROP.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1955PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

■ Brown, J.

The trial court referred to the principle that the jury’s answers to questions of fact are not to be disturbed if there is credible evidence to support .them. Strnad v. Cooperative Insurance Mutual (1949), 256 Wis. 261, 40 N. W. (2d) 552. And a court must view the evidence in the light most favorable in support of the verdict. Bovi v. Mellor (1948), 253 Wis. 458, 34 N. W. (2d) 780. Nevertheless, the trial court failed to discover evidence upon which the finding of negligent operation could be sustained and in this, we think, it erred. The jury could believe the testimony of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Strnad v. Co-Operative Insurance MutualWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Heucke v. Milwaukee City RailwayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Bovi v. MellorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Spleas v. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Cordes v. HoffmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Zernia v. Capitol Court Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Sharp v. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Bush v. MahlkuchWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API