Legal Opinion

United States v. Nazzaro

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided October 30, 1991No. Crim. 91-10070-SPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING OF LAW AND FINDING BASED ON THE STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES

SKINNER, District Judge.

The indictment in this case charges that on March 12, 1990, the defendant knowingly possessed five firearms after having been convicted of a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). The defendant and the government stipulated as follow:

1. that the defendant possessed the five firearms at the time and place alleged in the indictment;

2. that the defendant had been convicted of three crimes punishable by imprisonment for more than one year, two in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. James Ray ErwinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  2. Commonwealth v. DavisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  3. Chief of Police of Shelburne v. MoyerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
  4. United States v. ErwinDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 1989

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. DuPont v. Nashua Police DepartmentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2015
  2. Yanovitch v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1997
  3. Harris v. Office of Personnel ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  4. CHRISTIAN CAPANO v. MICHAELA DUNNE, as She is CHAIRPERSON OF THE FIREARM LICENSING REVIEW BOARD (And a Consolidated Case)Massachusetts Superior Court · 2021
  5. United States v. Alexander C. NazzaroCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API