(PC) Mills v. Jones
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 THOMAS K. MILLS, Case No. 1:21-cv-01193-DAD-HBK 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REPLY TO DEFENDANTS’ ANSWER 13 v. (Doc. No. 60) 14 I. Z. JONES, J. RIVERA, 15 Defendants. 16 17 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to file a Reply to Defendants’ Answer to 18 Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint. (Doc. No. 60). Defendants did not file a response in 19 opposition. See generally docket. The Court nonetheless denies the Motion. 20 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7(a) identifies the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Crawford-El v. BrittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Moviecolor Ltd. v. Eastman Kodak Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1959