Stephen Babineaux v. McBroom Rig Building Service, Inc. And North River Insurance Company, Intervenors-Appellees v. Reading & Bates Drilling Company
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
1Per curiam
We affirmed the district court’s determination in this case that the Louisiana Oilfield Indemnity Act (Anti-indemnity Act) barred Reading & Bates’ claim for indemnity-
Reading & Bates now argues in its petition for rehearing that the Anti-indemnity Act has only limited application. Reading & Bates argues that the Act does not affect the indemnity agreement to the extent that it requires McBroom to indemnify Reading & Bates for McBroom’s own negligence in injuring a McBroom employee. This argument is based on subsection B of the Anti-indemnity Act which provides:
B. Any provision contained in,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Robert Earl Meloy v. Conoco, Inc., Defendant-Third Party v. Oilfield Services of Cameron, Inc., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Robert Earl Meloy v. Conoco, Inc., Defendant-Third Party v. Oilfield Services of Cameron, Inc., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
3Cited by1 opinion
- Stephen Babineaux v. McBroom Rig Building Service, Inc., and North River Insurance Company, Intervenors-Appellees v. Reading & Bates Drilling CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987