State Ex Rel. Brooks Equipment & Mfg. Co. v. Evatt
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.
The question raised by the demurrer is whether the amended petition shows on its face that a clear, legal duty reposes upon respondent, William S. Evatt, the Director of Finance, to make the certification prayed for.
The amended petition alleges that “on December 29, 1938, and at all times herein mentioned since that date there was and is now an unexpended balance of appropriated funds in the maintenance and repair fund of the Department of Highways, unencumbered by precedent obligations sufficient in amount that the respondent, William S. Evatt, could and should make the certification as…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. Oakland Water Front Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
3Cited by1 opinion
- State Ex Rel. Brooks Equipment & Mfg. Co. v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1940