Legal Opinion
Forsythe v. Central Mutual Insurance Co. of NY
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided January 5, 1973No. 9385PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STEPI-IENSON, Justice.
This action was brought in Bernalillo County District Court by Barbara and Stanley Forsythe, who are mother and son. Douglas Forsythe, husband of Barbara and father of Stanley, was later added as a plaintiff aligned with Mrs. Forsythe by reason of his being the named insured in the Central Mutual Insurance Company of New York (“Central”) policy. The Forsythes are residents of New Jersey.
Mrs. Forsythe alleged that she purchased an Austin-Healy automobile (“the car”) on January 16, 1969 and, on the same day, paid for it and arranged for Central to issue liability…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Harrison v. FortlageSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Crook v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
- Schall Ex Rel. Estate of Braswell v. MondragonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
- Knotts v. Safeco Insurance Company of AmericaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- Universal C. I. T. Corp. v. Foundation Reserve InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jackie D. Suggs and Debra Suggs, Plaintiffs/appellees/cross-Appellants v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company and State Farm General Insurance Company, Defendants/appellants/cross-Appellees. Jackie D. Suggs and Debra Suggs v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company and State Farm General Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- State v. MontanoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
- Suggs v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- L'Allier v. TurnacliffNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988