Legal Opinion

Hilliard v. Chicago City Railway Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 4, 1911No. Gen. No. 15,867PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Action in case for personal injuries. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Ben M. Smith, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1909.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Graves

This is a suit to recover for personal injuries. The judgment against appellant was for $3,000. Two reasons are assigned why the judgment should be re-, versed. The first is, “because the verdict is against the overwhelming weight of the evidence,” and the second is, “the amount of damages awarded by the verdict is grossly excessive. ’ ’

Appellee was a married colored lady, thirty-eight years old, weighing two hundred fifty pounds, engaged at the time of the injury in the business of hair dressing and scalp treating. She was injured in her right leg between the ankle and the knee, while…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Behan v. John B. Honor Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
  2. Payton v. Great American Indemnity Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Shaffer v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
  4. Lyons v. Swift & CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Kirk v. E. L. Bruce Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API