Legal Opinion

Geampa v. Walck

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 22, 1995No. Appeal No. 2PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting the petition to set aside the Zoning Board of Appeals’ denial of petitioners’ application for a use variance to allow a dog kennel at petitioners’ residence. The determination of the Zoning Board of Appeals is entitled to great deference and must be sustained if it has a rational basis and is supported by substantial evidence (Matter of Cohen v Hahn, 155 AD2d 969, 970). To obtain a use variance, a petitioner "must demonstrate factually, by dollars and cents proof, an…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Village Board v. JarroldNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Cohen v. HahnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Farrell v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. Welsh v. Town of Amherst Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. Village of Honeoye Falls v. Town of Mendon Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API