Burley v. Kuykendall

I respectfully dissent from the holding of the majority that the chancellor was manifestly wrong in finding that the property was not susceptible to a fair division be*1039cause of its unique factors and that a sale would better promote the interest of all the parties as allowed by Mississippi Code Annotated section 11-21-11 (1972). The chancellor’s opinion, which covers some eight pages, demonstrates that he was thoroughly acquainted with the law and he applied that law to the facts of this case in minute detail, stating:

This Court is of the opinion that the facts as presented in this case…